...It was like a grand collection of experiments. And we were all used as 'test subjects' ... guinea pigs ... lab rats.

The population of Manhattan were used in that way, to test a wide variety of ExoW modalities: low-yield nukes, laser/particle/ maser, possibly even LRAD (long-range acoustic devices), aerosolized chemical explosives...And the rest of the American population were subjected to the latest in 'real-time' media psy-op weaponry; comprehensively detailed in outstanding exposes like 'September Clues'

--Lynn, 911 Inside Jobbers at Yahoogroups dot com

All attention was on the opposite side of where the Sth tower was hit. If anyone had a camera , why would they be taking videos or pictures of the South side of the Sth tower, when all the action was around the other side ?

That is presumably why the hits were organized in that way. It does not rule out any possibility of someone having a camera ready for the Sth tower hit - anything is possible - but it makes the probability negligible. Probably less likely than someone having a camera handy to film a street assault. Because anyone with a camera would already be getting everything they could of the Nth tower situation with no idea of what was to come - on the opposite side of the tower complex.

Secondly, if there were no striking object at all, then obviously nobody is going to be filming "nothing".

"I think I'll film that patch of sky over there, just in case a plane appears, or just in case the Sth tower happens to explode around about the 60th storey without a plane hitting it, then I'll be filming the sky in just the right spot so I can prove that there wasn't any plane."

In the event of there being no striking object - which after all, was what Eastman was attempting to portray as our solid view - no one would have *any reason* to be pointing their camera at that area until after the explosion.

Now suppose that it was struck by a small non plane object.

Even big planes traveling at modest speeds, further away, can sometimes be difficult to catch on camera, even when you've spotted them with the naked eye, and then put the camera up to your eye. It's easy to get the wrong patch of sky and have to search around a bit to locate them.

So if something small fast and unfamiliar came zipping along, when your attention was already distracted by the Nth tower, you would have almost zero chance of actually catching it with a camera.

(Gerard Holmgren, 3/21/06)

What do you think would happen if the world became aware that there were no hijacked planes that day, that two of the flights didn't exist, that the towers were attacked with secret technology, that the horrifying image which people saw on TV was just a movie, and that media also faked lists of passengers on the non existent flight which didn't hit the North tower, that a missile of some sort was fired into the pentagon and that fake videos and fake eyewitness reports were concocted to try to sell the story?

(Gerard Holmgren)